2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm @ 4850 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Rodeo | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Holden | Kia |
Model | Rodeo | RIO |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4850 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2570 mm |