2005 Holden UTE vs. 1972 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 850 kg more than 1972 Mini Clubman.
Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden UTE | 1972 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Holden | Mini |
Model | UTE | Clubman |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2140 mm |