2005 Holden UTE vs. 1982 Renault Siete

To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault Siete would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 160 more horse power than 1982 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault Siete.

Compare all specifications: