2005 Holden UTE vs. 1982 Skoda L
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 675 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden UTE | 1982 Skoda L | |
| Make | Holden | Skoda |
| Model | UTE | L |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2410 mm |
