2005 Holden UTE vs. 1983 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Westfield ZEI (217 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2005 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 775 kg more than 1983 Westfield ZEI.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Westfield ZEI. (292 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Westfield ZEI.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden UTE | 1983 Westfield ZEI | |
| Make | Holden | Westfield |
| Model | UTE | ZEI |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 292 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2340 mm |
