2005 Holden UTE vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 400 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden UTE | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | UTE | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2350 mm |
