2005 Holden UTE vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 240 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden UTE | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | UTE | AA-X |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2530 mm |
