2005 Holden UTE vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 500 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden UTE | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | UTE | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |