2005 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT.
Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi TT. (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden UTE | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Holden | Audi |
Model | UTE | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2469 mm |