2005 Holden UTE vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon.
Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden UTE | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
Make | Holden | Chrysler |
Model | UTE | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2390 mm |