2005 Holden UTE vs. 2013 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Holden UTE would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 20 kg more than 2005 Holden UTE.

Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Holden UTE 2013 Jeep Compass
Make Holden Jeep
Model UTE Compass
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 204 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 224 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1520 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4448 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1651 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2634 mm