2005 Honda Civic vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Honda Civic is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2005 Honda Civic. (82 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Civic | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Civic | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.1 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 4.9 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
