2005 Honda Civic vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 Honda Civic is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,685 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda Civic (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1999 MCC Smart. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1999 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda Civic weights approximately 431 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda Civic (151 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2005 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Civic | 1999 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Honda | MCC |
| Model | Civic | Smart |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1685 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 117 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1151 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.2 L/100km | 3.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.4 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 22 L |
