2005 Honda CR-V vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Honda CR-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda CR-V weights approximately 185 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2005 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1952 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1952 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda CR-V | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Honda | Riley |
| Model | CR-V | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1235 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2870 mm |
