2005 Honda CR-V vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2005 Honda CR-V is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma (175 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Honda CR-V. (137 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda CR-V weights approximately 30 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda CR-V (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda CR-V | 1992 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CR-V | Sigma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2202 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 137 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2730 mm |
