2005 Honda CR-V vs. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500
To start off, 2005 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda CR-V (192 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. (95 Nm). This means 2005 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 has automatic transmission and 2005 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2005 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Honda CR-V | 1993 Mitsubishi Mum 500 | |
Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
Model | CR-V | Mum 500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 500 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 95 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |