2005 Honda CR-V vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda CR-V (153 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2005 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda CR-V | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | CR-V | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 68 HP |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2360 mm |
