2005 Honda Fit vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Honda Fit is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,339 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda Fit (82 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda Fit weights approximately 560 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda Fit (119 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Honda Fit will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Fit | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Honda | Suzuki |
| Model | Fit | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1339 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2060 mm |
