2005 Honda Logo vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Honda Logo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda Logo weights approximately 10 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Mitsubishi Colt (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Honda Logo. (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Logo | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Honda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Logo | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 109 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2390 mm |
