2005 Honda Logo vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2005 Honda Logo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 478 more horse power than 2005 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Logo.
Because 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 533 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Honda Logo. (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Logo | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Honda | Jaguar |
| Model | Logo | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 109 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 340 mm |
