2005 Honda Stream vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Honda Stream is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Honda Stream is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Honda Stream (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Honda Stream should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Honda Stream weights approximately 846 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Stream, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Honda Stream (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Honda Stream will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan. 2005 Honda Stream has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Honda Stream will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Honda Stream | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Honda | Lotus |
Model | Stream | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |