2005 Honda Stream vs. 1993 Jaguar 220
To start off, 2005 Honda Stream is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar 220 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar 220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1993 Jaguar 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Jaguar 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Stream, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Honda Stream has automatic transmission and 1993 Jaguar 220 has manual transmission. 1993 Jaguar 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Honda Stream will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Stream | 1993 Jaguar 220 | |
| Make | Honda | Jaguar |
| Model | Stream | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2650 mm |
