2005 Honda Z vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Honda Z is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 275 kg more than 2005 Honda Z.
Because 2005 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Honda Z | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Honda | Riley |
| Model | Z | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
