2005 Hummer H2 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Hummer H2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Hummer H2 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Hummer H2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Hummer H2 (325 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2010 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Hummer H2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden UTE.
Because 2005 Hummer H2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hummer H2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Hummer H2 (495 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2005 Hummer H2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE. 2005 Hummer H2 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Hummer H2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Hummer H2 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Hummer | Holden |
Model | H2 | UTE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |