2005 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 70 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Hyundai Matrix | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Hyundai | Studebaker |
Model | Matrix | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2980 mm |