2005 Hyundai Matrix vs. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 296 kg more than 2005 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Hyundai Matrix | 1967 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Hyundai | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Matrix | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 2106 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 109 L |