2005 Infiniti QX56 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Infiniti QX56. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Infiniti QX56 would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Infiniti QX56 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Infiniti QX56 (315 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Infiniti QX56 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2005 Infiniti QX56 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Infiniti QX56. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Infiniti QX56 (529 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2005 Infiniti QX56 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Infiniti QX56 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Infiniti | Ford |
Model | QX56 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5555 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 57 L |