2005 Isuzu Ascender vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 844 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Isuzu Ascender | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Ascender | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2700 mm |