2005 Isuzu KB vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Isuzu I-290 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Isuzu I-290 should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290. 2005 Isuzu KB has automatic transmission and 2008 Isuzu I-290 has manual transmission. 2008 Isuzu I-290 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Isuzu KB will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Isuzu KB | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | Isuzu | Isuzu |
Model | KB | I-290 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2901 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 74 L |