2005 Isuzu KB vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu KB weights approximately 835 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu KB (265 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Suzuki Equator. (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Suzuki Equator. 2005 Isuzu KB has automatic transmission and 2009 Suzuki Equator has manual transmission. 2009 Suzuki Equator will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Isuzu KB will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Isuzu KB | 2009 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Isuzu | Suzuki |
| Model | KB | Equator |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2488 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 265 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 975 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 80 L |
