2005 Isuzu KB vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,998 cc, 2005 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Isuzu KB. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Isuzu KB.
Because 2005 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu KB (265 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Isuzu KB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica. 2005 Isuzu KB has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Isuzu KB will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Isuzu KB | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Isuzu | Holden |
Model | KB | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2492 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 265 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |