2005 Jaguar S-Type vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 885 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (541 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar S-Type | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Jaguar | Wartburg |
Model | S-Type | 312 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 391 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 6.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |