2005 Jaguar S-Type vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (391 HP) has 271 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 2005 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (541 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar S-Type | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
| Model | S-Type | Cube |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |
