2005 Jaguar S-Type vs. 2010 Lada 110
To start off, 2010 Lada 110 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 315 more horse power than 2010 Lada 110. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 750 kg more than 2010 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar S-Type (541 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 425 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lada 110. (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lada 110. 2005 Jaguar S-Type has automatic transmission and 2010 Lada 110 has manual transmission. 2010 Lada 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar S-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar S-Type | 2010 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lada |
| Model | S-Type | 110 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.9 seconds | 14.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1845 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.6 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |
