2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 115 kg more than 2005 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2005 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | X-Type | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3130 mm |
