2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (227 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1965 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1965 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1965 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (279 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1965 Mini MK I | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | X-Type | MK I |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 279 Nm | 60 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1647 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2040 mm |