2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (194 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 130 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (241 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | X-Type | 240 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 203 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 54 L |