2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (152 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 562 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (155 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | X-Type | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1502 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 57 L |