2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (194 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (241 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | X-Type | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2489 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |