2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (154 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 1981 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (200 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | X-Type | 240 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2099 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2660 mm |