2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover Mini would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (228 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1998 Rover Mini. (62 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover Mini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 1009 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Rover Mini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (279 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar X-Type | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Jaguar | Rover |
| Model | X-Type | Mini |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 279 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2750 mm |
