2005 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Jaguar X-Type. (152 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar X-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jaguar X-Type. (155 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar X-Type | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | X-Type | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3010 mm |