2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 324 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 455 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XJ | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
| Model | XJ | Renown |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2750 mm |
