2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 725 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XJ | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XJ | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 45 L |
