2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1354 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (38 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
Model | XJ | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 38 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 1970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 66 L |