2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1972 Rover P5B
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1972 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 145 kg more than 1972 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover P5B. (295 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 1972 Rover P5B | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | XJ | P5B |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3528 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 295 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2820 mm |