2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1982 Lancia A 112
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1982 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XJ | 1982 Lancia A 112 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
| Model | XJ | A 112 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 903 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 655 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2040 mm |
