2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1982 Seat 127

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat 127 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1982 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1982 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat 127. (64 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat 127.

Compare all specifications: