2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 964 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XJ | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zastava |
| Model | XJ | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 541 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1734 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2160 mm |
