2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 618 kg more than 1992 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XJ | 1992 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Rover |
| Model | XJ | 400 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1176 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2560 mm |
